Clarifying on food scrapping: Manor officials worked on project for three years, earlier proposal too costly
To the editor:
While I appreciate the passion that comes to many village issues, I would like to clarify for your readers the process involved in bringing forward a program like food scrapping from idea to action.
As an environmental engineer with over 30-plus years of experience in the industry, I have had the opportunity to bring many projects and programs to fruition. This process is very similar to the iceberg analogy. The projects and programs that are launched are the proverbial “tip of the iceberg.” The rest of the iceberg are those projects (which are usually based on new and emerging ideas) that are under consideration. The truth is, good management always considers and reconsiders many new and emerging ideas. It vets those ideas out and, once they make sense, it moves those ideas through planning, design, construction, startup and, finally, operation. I have been (and continue to be) involved in all of these phases as a function of my professional work. Currently, I am working on over $6 billion worth of environmental projects at various points of planning, design, construction and startup. I am also involved in the operations of environmental facilities and understand what the opportunities and challenges associated with these facilities are
As a commissioner of public works for the Village of Pelham Manor, I, along with the rest of the board of trustees, the village manager and members of our community have been evaluating a food-scrapping option for over three years. We have spoken to members of our community, as well as volunteers and professionals countywide who have been involved with implementing food scrapping (more specifically, food composting) in other Westchester communities. Our conversations have included cost and operational consideration. Of course, I have also added my own experience.
After evaluation of that version of a food-scrapping program, the board concluded it was not the right time to offer a food-scrapping option. We found it was both costly and did not result in an immediate benefit to our carbon footprint. These are conclusions that are supported in Westchester’s Jan. 21, 2020 report entitled “Food Waste Study Report”.
All information provided in this letter (and more) has been discussed during board meetings. Just one of our conversations can be accessed via our website. (Note I provide a significant number of details including specific costs between minute 23:30 and minute 35.)
We are looking forward to our neighbors participating in this program as passionately as they do our curbside recycling!
A. Michelle DeLillo
Trustee, Deputy Mayor and Commissioner of Public Works
Village of Pelham Manor
933 Peace St.
Michael Teitelbaum • Feb 14, 2021 at 2:19 pm
The letter this is responding to was an endorsement of the opposing candidates and likewise this letter reads more like a campaign statement from an incumbent than as an objective statement of fact about the program.
As such, it is of course wholly appropriate as a letter to the editor or as a Facebook post by a candidate.
But it feels ethically questionable to have also been sent in an official VoPM email to everyone in the Manor that signed up for official VoPM announcements.
Deborah Winstead • Feb 14, 2021 at 10:56 am
Investigating programs is great! The problem is that the Manor didn’t investigate. They stonewalled – residents received repeated no’s on the program: No public forums with a presentation of the facts, repeated refusals to put a presentation of the program on the Manor agenda, failing to address the negligible budget impact and that grants are and have been available to offset the cost.
The program being implemented now with the VOP could have been implemented 4 years ago.
Anaerobic digesters and co-digesters are being looked at on the county level and won’t be up and running for 5-10 years. So there is no reason for this about face except that public pressure built to the point that the Manor government could no longer fight against the program.