Editor’s note: This statement was provided by the below signed former mayors of the Village of Pelham and the Village of Pelham Manor. The Pelham Examiner publishes statements in the form received as a service to the community.
A voter referendum known as Proposition 3 will be on the Tuesday, November 5, 2024 ballot. Pelham Manor residents will vote on whether Pelham Manor Village elections should be moved from March to November. As former mayors of both villages who care deeply about our community, we urge residents to Vote No on Proposition 3.
Local Elections Should Focus on Pelham
Each of us served as mayor as a public service to our community. At the national level we are of different political stripes and national party affiliations, but we got involved for Pelham, not for politics. In our view, local elections should have as little as possible to do with national politics. Villages provide essential services such as police, fire and sanitation. These services touch our daily lives, and the administration of these services is managerial in nature.
At the village level, we should vote for the person, not the party. Holding local elections separately is the best way to achieve this, which is why most village elections in New York State have historically been held in March, not November. For the same reason, school board elections are held in May, far from November.
Distancing Elections from National Politics Encourages Citizen Involvement
Village government should appeal to the best and brightest candidates who are committed to Pelham. Attracting qualified people is already difficult, and the prospect of having to confront national politics could become an insurmountable deterrent to prospective local candidates.
The Process for March Elections Is Vastly Different from November Elections
The process for holding March elections is shorter, simpler and more democratic. At a town-hall style caucus, typically held in January, anyone (regardless of party affiliation) can be nominated either by the party holding the caucus or from the floor. Ballots are cast in real time, and the candidates with the most votes become the nominees. It is an open, transparent and highly democratic process. From that point, it is approximately six weeks until elections are held in March.
Holding a village election in November can extend the process to more than eight months. For example, this year candidate petitions were circulated in late February, the primary, with a formal ballot process, was held on June 25, and the election is November 5th. As village mayors and trustees serve two-year terms, moving local elections to November results in a process that consumes approximately one-third of the time in office, and anyone seeking office must invest in an eight-month election process before a potential term even begins.
November Elections Will Not Consistently Increase Turnout
The argument that holding elections in November will produce a higher turnout does not appear to be supported by recent election data. In the 2023 November election (which involved contested races for county legislator, Pelham Town Council and other positions), 1,792 votes were cast by Pelham Manor residents. In the 2024 March elections (which involved solely a contested race for the Village of Pelham Manor Board of Trustees), 1,875 votes were cast by Pelham Manor residents.
Although turnout in presidential elections is often higher, such elections, of course, occur only every four years. In addition, there will no longer be odd-year elections as a result of new NYS legislation. All elections will be on the same even-year cycle as national and state offices. If village elections were moved to November, in odd years, voters would be going to the polls to cast votes only for mayor and two village trustees. In even years, candidates for two trustee positions would be crowded onto the ballot after candidates for: president or governor, U.S. Congress, state assembly, state senator, county legislator, county district attorney, town supervisor and town council.
Let’s Keep Pelham Manor Elections Strictly Local
Given the same facts, most people will come to the same conclusion about what is best for our wonderful community. To achieve this collective good, we support holding village elections that are strictly local and separate from November elections. Accordingly, we recommend that Pelham Manor residents Vote No on Proposition 3.
Your Committed Neighbors,
Former Village of Pelham Manor Mayors:
Peter DiPaola Jr.
Brian Gallagher
Lorri Gorman
John Kiernan
Thomas Lavin
James O’Connor
Stephen Rooney
Ferdinand S. Spucci
Valentine Taubner Jr.
Former Village of Pelham Mayors:
Timothy Cassidy
Joseph Durnin
Arthur Scinta
Michael Volpe
Michelle DeLillo • Oct 22, 2024 at 7:54 am
I will also be voting “no” on proposition 3 for the same reasons these former Mayors (who include representation from both parties) outline. I am the most recent former Deputy Mayor of Pelham Manor (yes, I am a Republican and that has nothing to do with my choice). It was my honor to volunteer my time and skills to the community that I love. I (along with my fellow Board Members) served with no compensation. Being on the Board and serving was a labor of love that required time and patience. I juggled this with my fulltime job. Moving Village Elections to November would be asking uncompensated Board Members to spend a third of their two-year term campaigning (as you can imagine, campaigning also takes time and patience). This is a burden that will deter competent and talented Village Residents from volunteering for these very important operational roles. March elections allow for a six-week election cycle (as opposed to eight months) during a time of the year when voters can focus solely on local issues and getting to know candidates (in our small community, it is very likely that you will either know a candidate or have the opportunity to meet them). In New York State, March is the default month (as set by NYS) for Village Elections, and allows for conversation focused solely on local issues. I will be voting to maintain March elections.
Scott Wolfgang • Oct 21, 2024 at 9:48 pm
I find it a bit ironic that those pushing for a change to a 100+ year process for almost entirely partisan reasons are now trying to label those who value the benefits of our longstanding independent election as the partisans. VoPM residents do not often vote along partisan lines in our March elections, and focus instead on electing high quality leadership who have run an exemplary village with impeccable services throughout the years. What’s also disappointing is that when presented with very strong rationale for separate, independent village elections, the Town of Pelham Dem Committee leadership behind the referendum continues to try to label others, including dedicated public servants, as partisan. I encourage everyone to read this letter closely and continue to educate themselves on the impacts of a date change referendum and the motivations of those pushing it.
Steven Shekane • Oct 21, 2024 at 8:04 pm
1) This was a statement and not a Letter to the Editor. It is clearly indicated.
2) Ms. Frost should check party affiliations before commenting with wrong information. Knee jerk reactions and accusations are not very neighborly.
Emily Pauley • Oct 21, 2024 at 7:52 pm
I so hope the mayors of Scarsdale or Larchmont or Mamaroneck or New Rochelle or Mount Vernon soon give their opinion. Are these writers of this joint letter even residents of Pelham Manor?
Joseph Vitarello • Oct 21, 2024 at 8:24 pm
Why would a Pelham Manor resident care about Scarsdale, Larchmont, Mamaroneck, or New Rochelle or Mt Vernon’s opinion?
Chris Ganpat • Oct 21, 2024 at 8:37 pm
They are all longtime residents, that have deep ties to this community and have raised their kids and grand kids here also. Have deep investments financially here, Have spent years dedicating their time and affection to this community. Most still live here if not all and continue to support local everyday.
Natali Wind • Oct 21, 2024 at 9:36 pm
Yes, longtime residents who support the status quo because it worked for them and probably continues to work for their buddies.
The status quo is why Pelham is still not what it could be. The town needs shaking up which is what increased turnout will hopefully lead to, but that is exactly what these people are afraid of and why they are fighting against it so hard.
Chris Ganpat • Oct 22, 2024 at 7:30 am
I’m sorry but you are way off, Please elaborate on “what it could be” means? I’m sure they thought the same thing on the other side of town, but they have a growing 6 million dollar debt and all types of shaking up happening, IE Julianne’s playground ,Street Crossings missing buttons, seems really expensive those shake ups… Also how could a bunch of 15+ year residents be lalbeled “status quo”? lol. They served this community and still do. How bout you? Is it polite to refer to your neighbors as such? All the lather comments have no credibility, this is the issue, Know your history or most likely we are condemned to repeat? We had a left sided board here already, this is what you are really fighting for ? It’ didn’t work out well so the residents chose to go right. 1 in 5 is not majority it’s 20%, we expect our local govt to represent the other 80% accordingly. We are not as unhappy as you seem to be, we the majority are very content, this is why we bring our kids and grand kids back to raise their families, It’s the people trying to “shake things up” WE are afraid of.
Eileen Miller • Oct 21, 2024 at 7:15 pm
Is the Examiner now accepting letters signed by a list of people? I thought that was no longer the practice.
Allison Frost • Oct 21, 2024 at 6:34 pm
Every signer was elected as a Republican. Partisan indeed.
Amanda Jaskiewicz • Oct 21, 2024 at 3:51 pm
Are these mayors from any party? Legitimately curious.