To the editor:
I just returned from the office of Catherine Mazzaro, the Town of Pelham receiver of taxes. I went there to pay my Feb. 1 school property tax, an amount due of $12,616.19. I had a check in hand for that amount. I was aware that I was 11 days late with this payment, and I was prepared to have to pay a penalty of some sort. I was told that the penalty was $1261.62, and I had to pay that amount. Period! It made no difference that I was only 11 days late; it made no difference that this property has been in my family for over 70 years and no payment of tax had ever been late; it made no difference that I am 78 years old. It had to be paid, and no discussion was allowed.
I am lucky that I can afford to pay this outrageous penalty—and I will. But I suspect that there are many in our community for whom this may not be true. But this will make no difference to Mazzaro. Is this really what we want in a “public servant?” It isn’t hard to see who is the servant here. Keep this in mind for future elections. We can do better.
Steven Bratone
147 Nyac Ave.
Will Cavanagh • Feb 12, 2025 at 10:41 pm
Hi Steven, we can feel your pain about the penalty on the late school tax payment but the Pelham tax collector cannot be blamed here. My understanding is the penalty rate is set by the State. More important, under State law, the tax collector has no authority to waive the penalty charge and is personally liable for the unpaid penalty if they attempt to waive it. This is something the State can examine on audit so no tax collector can afford to chance it.
Regards
Will Cavanagh
Ferdinand Spucci • Feb 12, 2025 at 7:22 pm
I share your concern Steven, but, you are blaming the wrong person. Ms.Mazzaro, and the rest of the staff, are merely following the law. Your September bill made if very clear as to what the penalty would be for being late in January. Most of us have made the same costly mistake at sometime in our sojourn.
Perhaps we need to pay more attention to what is going on with the Pelham School Board and run candidates who can represent those who no longer have children in school but simply wish to live their lives where their memories were made.
Good luck
Natali Wind • Feb 13, 2025 at 7:31 pm
“and run candidates who can represent those who no longer have children in school but simply wish to live their lives where their memories were made”
And can represent those who have never had children in school.